I am always amazed that the IPCC uses a series of papers with huge error bars to claim a 90% certainty in "human" caused warming. This 90% is then upped to "undeniable" to justify the statement that the debate is over. When did huge errors in science become 90% certainty and 90% certainty become "undeniable"?
"Undeniable" then becomes a reason to shut down opposing views.
No comments:
Post a Comment